AICIS Policy and Conditions 

The review process is "double blind" - identification of both authors and referees is removed from all documentation. The Conference IPC believes that the review of papers gives conference participants and other readers some confidence in the quality of the papers specified as "refereed" in the proceedings.

As a note to the papers' authors the following checklist will be used by the reviewers
to evaluate the quality of the papers:

 The editors of the conference proceeding are committed to maintaining the highest ethical standards for all parties involved in the act of publishing in a peer-reviewed proceeding: the author, the editor of the proceeding, the peer reviewer and the publisher.

Our publishing ethics, both internally and externally, are based on- and adhere to- the Committee on Publication Ethics's (COPE) Best Practice Guidelines for Proceeding Editors and Conduct for Proceeding Publishers. In order to ensure the outcome of providing our readers with a high-quality academic proceeding of, the Proceeding is guided by the following principles:-

​​​​​​​

Editor Responsibilities

Accountability: The editors of a peer-reviewed proceeding are accountable and responsible for deciding which articles submitted to the proceeding should be published. The editor may be guided by the policies of the proceeding's editorial board and constrained by legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism. The editor may confer with other editors or reviewers when making this decision.

Fair play: An editor should evaluate manuscripts for those intellectual content regardless of race, gender, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors.

Confidentiality: The editor and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate.

Disclosure and conflicts of interest: Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.

Author Responsibilities

Reporting standards: Authors should present their results clearly, honestly, and without fabrication, falsification or inappropriate data manipulation. Authors should describe their methods clearly and unambiguously so that their findings can be confirmed by others.

Originality, plagiarism and acknowledgement of sources: Authors should adhere to publication requirements that submitted work is original, is not plagiarized, and has not been published elsewhere - fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Should an author used the work and/or words of others, then his citation and his quotation should be duly and appropriately.

Data Access and Retention: Authors may be asked to provide the raw data in connection with a paper for editorial review, and should in any event be prepared to retain such data for a reasonable time after publication.

Ethics: Authors should only submit papers only on work that has been conducted in an ethical and responsible manner and that complies with all relevant legislation.

Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest: All authors should disclose in their manuscript any financial or other substantive conflict of interest that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed.

Authorship of the Paper: Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors. Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged or listed as contributors. The corresponding author should ensure that all appropriate co-authors and no inappropriate co-authors are included in the paper, and that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication.

Multiple, Redundant or Concurrent Publication: generally, An author should not publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one proceeding or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one proceeding concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior will not be considered.

Fundamental errors in published works: When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her own published work, it is the author’s obligation to promptly notify the proceeding editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to rectify or correct the paper.